dan brown pinched the idea from michael bagent's holy blood and the holy grail.
took so much from his book they felt their intellectual property had been breached.
dan brown acknowledge the author by using a character with the anagram of baigent's name
who didnt think that was good enough
the holy grail as a person.. as blood.. as the womb .. jesus' bloodline >> mary magdaline
the trouble is that this is fiction and most people are too stupid to know this.. they clasp onto the idea and change history because of it
based on facts, christians require evidence (?) the bible? why not davinci code?
no new testiment evidence until about 150 years after jesus/ death
baigent lost the court case - enough wasn't taken to constitute a legal infringement
the jesus papers... baigent
4th century and created a theological jesus and lost the real jesus/history
jesus wasn't considered devine.. until many years after his death
4th century spin
lets get back to an historical jesus.. more compatible with christianity, jewdism and islam
how many rivers of blood have to flow til we agree on what name to give to god
the notion the degree that doctrin was fabricated in the 4th and all the christians started beliving by unscrupulous group flies in the face of human pyschology
important and true - people believe..ldavinci code