I am blogging. or not, rather. This is not a pipe. I have so many things I want to talk about:

• Dan Brown / The crappy DaVinci Code
• the weather
• classes
• sites
• work
• public transport
• civil unions
• wedding photos
• beautiful days
• visitors
• love
• elearning
• Later with Jools Holland

so yeh.. I want to tell you all about these things but can't wrangle anything but wanted you to know that I was thinking about stuff. Fancy a coffee? and a chat?

davinci code dan brown pinched the idea from michael bagent's holy blood and the holy grail. baigent took so much from his book they felt their intellectual property had been breached. dan brown acknowledge the author by using a character with the anagram of baigent's name who didnt think that was good enough the holy grail as a person.. as blood.. as the womb .. jesus' bloodline >> mary magdaline Opus Dei the trouble is that this is fiction and most people are too stupid to know this.. they clasp onto the idea and change history because of it based on facts, christians require evidence (?) the bible? why not davinci code? no new testiment evidence until about 150 years after jesus/ death baigent lost the court case - enough wasn't taken to constitute a legal infringement the jesus papers... baigent 4th century and created a theological jesus and lost the real jesus/history aramaic jesus wasn't considered devine.. until many years after his death 325 (creed) 4th century spin lets get back to an historical jesus.. more compatible with christianity, jewdism and islam how many rivers of blood have to flow til we agree on what name to give to god patrick reilly the notion the degree that doctrin was fabricated in the 4th and all the christians started beliving by unscrupulous group flies in the face of human pyschology important and true - people believe..ldavinci code